Compliance
Governance that ships with evidence.
Compliance is built into the workflows and data model. The goal is to make ownership, evidence, and review easier to track without making the experience feel heavy.
Areas of focus
These are the parts of the system that make compliance and institutional review easier to support.
Governance
Approval chains
Academic and HR actions should move through clear approval routes with evidence attached to the final outcome.
Lineage
Canonical data model
Programs, cohorts, interventions, and workflow records should stay traceable through a single consistent structure.
Reporting
Review exports
Exports should help leaders answer review questions without having to reconstruct the evidence manually.
Readiness
Accreditation support
Meridian should make it easier to gather the records, summaries, and proofs needed for formal review.
Evidence flow
How compliance evidence stays usable.
Capture the action
The workflow records what happened, who handled it, and what the result was.
Tie it to the canon
The action sits inside the canonical model so it can be traced back to the right person, section, or program.
Package it for review
The record should be easy to export, summarize, and explain in a questionnaire or audit response.
Request artifacts
What we can share on request.
- Governance summaries and approval-flow descriptions.
- Data lineage and canonical model explanations.
- Security and access control references.
- Questionnaire or review support where available.